<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long Exposure Shots at the fairground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hapit.co.uk/index.php/2009/08/04/long-exposure-shots-at-the-fairground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hapit.co.uk/index.php/2009/08/04/long-exposure-shots-at-the-fairground/</link>
	<description>Bits and Pieces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reeta</title>
		<link>http://www.hapit.co.uk/index.php/2009/08/04/long-exposure-shots-at-the-fairground/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Reeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 08:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hapit.co.uk/?p=608#comment-121</guid>
		<description>yeah thanks Martin...I&#039;ll play around with them as per your suggestions and see how they turn out. 

Magazine sounds awesome. Not sure if they will make it though but definitely worth a shot! 

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah thanks Martin&#8230;I&#8217;ll play around with them as per your suggestions and see how they turn out. </p>
<p>Magazine sounds awesome. Not sure if they will make it though but definitely worth a shot! </p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin balk</title>
		<link>http://www.hapit.co.uk/index.php/2009/08/04/long-exposure-shots-at-the-fairground/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin balk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hapit.co.uk/?p=608#comment-120</guid>
		<description>The top shot is just so good it is hard to say how it could be improved. May be just darken the top left corner.
The secomd one is also of a very high standard. Would benifit from darkening top right.
The third photo would benifit from white balance being a touch warmer.
I agree the fact that it was not totaly dark is what makes thes photos.

Yesterday, Digital Photographer was asking for long exposure images for use in magazine, this is the link http://www.dphotographer.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1701 I would suggest entering the top two. They do not pay, but it is good exposure.
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top shot is just so good it is hard to say how it could be improved. May be just darken the top left corner.<br />
The secomd one is also of a very high standard. Would benifit from darkening top right.<br />
The third photo would benifit from white balance being a touch warmer.<br />
I agree the fact that it was not totaly dark is what makes thes photos.</p>
<p>Yesterday, Digital Photographer was asking for long exposure images for use in magazine, this is the link <a href="http://www.dphotographer.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1701" rel="nofollow">http://www.dphotographer.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1701</a> I would suggest entering the top two. They do not pay, but it is good exposure.<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
